The Expansion They Rejected

The paranoia wasn’t random.
It was emotional self-defence dressed up as intelligence.

They told themselves I was scamming them.
Using them.
Manipulating them.
Abusing them.

And they carried that narrative with a heavy pinch of pride —
the kind that lets you feel morally superior while doing absolutely nothing to understand the situation you’re reacting to.

That pride did most of the work for them.

Because the pushback the court actually needed to hear wasn’t about me.
It was about how they allowed their own emotions to reject the one expansion they didn’t want to reject, that could’ve avoided being in court in the first place, and given hope to the people.

The one that disrupted their comfort.
The one that challenged their self-image.
The one that would have required them to look again.

Not instantly agree.
Not instantly follow.
Just look closer.

At least ask more questions.

But questions are exposing.

When you ask a question, you reveal:

  • what you don’t know
  • what you’re curious about
  • what you think the other person might see more clearly than you
  • where your own limits are

And that’s unbearable for people whose ego is bigger than their capacity for relationship.

So instead of putting their swords down,
they chose to self-sabotage.

Not just the relationship with me — I’m sure I’m not the only one..
but everything around them that could have grown through that moment.

They chose narrative over communication.
Projection over curiosity.
Distance over dialogue.

I understand why.

It would have taken more than intelligence to communicate with me.
It would have taken humility.
It would have taken willingness.
It would have taken the courage to be wrong in public.

But to not even try?

That’s the part that stays heavy.

Not because they didn’t collaborate with me.
I don’t measure worth in participation.

But because they rejected the one expansion that could have taught them something about themselves and everyone else around them,
even if they later decided not to walk that path.

I hope they learned something anyway.

I hope they opened somewhere else because of this.
I hope they didn’t harden.

Because hardening would be the exact opposite of what I was meant to be in their lives.

Together, I would have brought:
joy
youth
sunshine
movement
perspective

Not as a gift to me —
as a gift to them.

If my absence gave them the chance to become that for themselves,
even if through ridiculing me,
then the mission still completed itself.

Not because I was accepted.
But because something in them was forced to move.

And movement — even through resistance —
is still life choosing not to stagnate.


Discover more from SHS – Human First Blog

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.



Listen to Our Podcast Here


Subscribe to the podcast

Support the show

Help us make the show. By making a contribution, you will help us to make stories that matter and you enjoy.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.