I jus don’t give a flipping fuck about apologies, if the behaviour or character doesn’t grow.

One of the reasons: I have spent years watching people mistake awareness for action. Years of apologies turned into stone, by the same who have created them. Years of awareness and no change.

The two are not the same.

Not even close.

An apology can acknowledge a problem.

An apology can recognise a problem.

An apology can even admit responsibility for a problem.

But none of those things are the same as changing the problem.

That distinction seems obvious.

Yet modern society behaves as though it is not.

People apologise.

Companies apologise.

Institutions apologise.

Governments apologise.

Industries apologise.

And somehow the apology itself is often treated as the resolution.

The issue is that reality does not work that way.

If I break something and apologise, the thing remains broken.

If I neglect something and apologise, the neglect still happened.

If I contribute to a system that produces harm and apologise for it, the system still exists.

The apology may be sincere.

The apology may even be appreciated.

But sincerity and change are not synonyms.

This is where I think many people become confused.

They think awareness is action.

It is not.

Awareness is the doorway to action.

Action is what walks through it.

And the reason I hold this position so strongly is because I have lived it.

Before the scorecards.

Before the Universal Bar.

Before holding systems accountable publicly.

I went directly to people.

Directly to industries.

Directly to organisations.

Directly to positions of responsibility.

I pointed out limitations.

I highlighted consequences.

I explained risks.

I explained impacts.

I explained blind spots.

I explained where systems were failing their own stated purpose.

The awareness was there.

The information was there.

The observations were there.

Yet the action rarely followed.

Which taught me something important.

The absence of awareness is not always the problem.

Sometimes the problem is the absence of responsibility after awareness.

And that is a much harder problem to solve.

Because ignorance can be educated.

Avoidance is a choice.

This is why I struggle when people treat accountability as though it belongs only to institutions.

Institutions are made of people.

Systems are operated by people.

Roles are occupied by people.

Titles are held by people.

Decisions are made by people.

A legal system does not maintain itself.

People maintain it.

An educational system does not teach itself.

People teach it.

A healthcare system does not run itself.

People run it.

A media system does not create itself.

People create it.

Which means that if someone works inside a system every single day, sees its limitations every single day, experiences its failures every single day, and then contributes to its continuation without attempting to improve it, they become part of the continuity of that limitation.

That is not hatred.

That is not blame for the sake of blame.

That is responsibility.

Responsibility is not always comfortable.

In fact, responsibility is often uncomfortable because it forces us to acknowledge our contribution to outcomes we may not like.

People often want to separate themselves from the consequences of systems while continuing to benefit from their position inside those systems.

That separation rarely exists.

If I contribute to something, I am connected to its outcomes.

That does not make me solely responsible.

But it does make me partially responsible.

And partial responsibility is still responsibility.

This is one of the reasons I often become frustrated with entire industries that possess enormous reach and then refuse to use it.

Reach creates responsibility.

Influence creates responsibility.

Visibility creates responsibility.

Knowledge creates responsibility.

A person with a platform carries different responsibilities than someone without one.

A person who sees further carries different responsibilities than someone who cannot yet see.

That is not punishment.

That is stewardship.

The larger the field you influence, the greater your duty of care becomes.

This applies everywhere.

It applies to governments.

It applies to educators.

It applies to lawyers.

It applies to healthcare professionals.

It applies to spiritual teachers.

It applies to business owners.

It applies to content creators.

It applies to me.

And it applies to anyone reading this.

The question is never whether responsibility exists.

The question is whether we accept it.

Because responsibility has an interesting property.

The moment you accept it, your options expand.

The moment you reject it, your excuses expand.

One creates possibility.

The other creates justification.

This is why I care so little about apologies and so much about action.

Action is measurable.

Action leaves evidence.

Action changes reality.

Action improves systems.

Action educates people.

Action protects continuity.

Action creates better outcomes.

Awareness alone does none of those things.

Awareness simply tells us where the work begins.

That is all.

The work itself still needs to happen.

And perhaps that is what makes me different from many people.

I do not care whether someone can recognise the problem.

I care whether they are willing to participate in the solution.

Because the world is already full of people who can describe what is wrong.

What continuity needs now is people willing to help make something right.

An apology can announce that journey.

Only action can walk it.

---

Great work here. Now, I want you to write a blog post, and I’m going to merge another piece of it that I was already writing out to fill the whole image, because when it comes to apologizing, because people will see it as an action of its own self now, apologizing doesn’t do anything. I don’t even know why it’s still a thing, because apologizing, if anything, I mean, I do understand that apologizing raises the, like, shows the awareness to something, but being aware to something, because we’ve already proven that being aware of something doesn’t necessarily make someone feel the need to act on it, because all the legal system, before we even got to this point where I’m writing all scorecards and whatnot, I went to each and every single one of those industries to hold them accountable personally. Because they didn’t take the accountability directly, now we’ve held accountable their foundations, their roles, their positions, their companies, their systems, because they don’t seem to understand that their actions impact the wholeness, not in consciousness, like in the ethereal meaning, alone, though it does too, but on a physical basis first. If people can’t see their impact on people physically, directly, when it happens, they’re not going to be able to truly notice the fact that they are the biggest problem to it all because they’re investing in the system that has the biggest impact towards it. Meaning that if someone has, for example, a career in law, they are the biggest enablers to the jurisdictional system in the country. So they are to blame. Well, some might say, well, we don’t like to blame, especially if it can’t be rectified by proof and all that. I already know how AI is going to answer this one, right? Now, the issue is that they are to blame, whether we should or shouldn’t blame them. They are to blame because they are also part of the reasons as to why the legal system is still behind. Because they handle legal system on a daily basis, they are the ones that are inside of the legal system on a daily basis, meaning they see the limitations of the legal system on a daily basis, and they choose not to do anything about the limitations that they experience. It’s like content creators, for any normal content creators, not saying words like death or sex or whatever it might be, it’s completely fine. Imagine someone that has a finance website, a finance… Platform on YouTube, they don’t need to talk about death. So even if they need to say the word, it’s okay for them to say and use something else. But for someone that works in the mystical, someone that works in the spiritual, someone that works in the mythical, someone that works in anything energy-related or even health-related or even psychologically related, all those should be able to say the words death and so many other words without being canceled or without that video being lowered or whatever, you know? So if someone plays the game of other industries in the industry of their own, the same way spiritualists do, they play other industries’ rules within their own, not understanding that their role has way bigger responsibility. Spirituality has way bigger responsibility than logic does because it’s something that the logic hasn’t fully understood yet. So if you’re working for the spiritual, your main focus should be to get the logic part of people’s brains to actually understand the ethereal, what they call abstract concept that the spiritual or spirituality, which is all about energy, is about. But if someone doesn’t take that responsibility seriously, then they’re not just hindering the people that are there to that industry because they’re looking for something different. The people that are there in the industry that are looking for something different will find the exact same thing as any other industry just under a different dome, which is just language. they’re literally just going through different wordings to the exact same behavior. If you look at all spiritualists, they’re all doing the exact same. They’re all polishing to do the exact same. And all of this to say that there’s so many things that people don’t even consider, just like apologies versus actually changing, actually doing the work, actually educating people, actually educating themselves, actually expanding, actually taking care of what needs to be taken care of, duty of care, be responsible for the things that we need to be responsible for. I don’t care about apologies. I care about our consciousness in the physical and in time.And another post that I want to write about what makes me different, because all of this has really been a trail of what makes me different, is the fact that I really don’t care about apologies. I could wash my ass cheeks with apologies because apologies don’t do anything for the type of people that I understand to coexist with. People that apologize don’t feel the urge to do an action because they feel like the apology was the action. Can be further from the truth, right? So because people now see apology as an action and not aftercare, they think that they’re reopening a cycle without really opening one. But apologies don’t do anything. Apologies really don’t do anything, especially when it’s not apologies that are needed. Action is the only way forward, but action is also based on how many actions can you actually do. I might have a limited amount of action that can align with my path, meaning I’m not going to go down the road and beg the salesperson or the billionaire that doesn’t understand anything about what I do, only cares about money, and doesn’t even value responsibility or accountability. I’m not going to go and beg them for money. That’s why I play the lottery, because people don’t value all the things that I’m building for. So because I understand my target audience, I understand that they’re not going to give me their money because I’m not focusing on the things that value, which is money. I’m looking to build my business in a way that makes money to erase money. So my values, my intentions are completely different. I don’t need to play the way these normal people go about getting finances for their businesses because they are not building conscious businesses. So of course the intention is not going to be the same. They don’t value the ssme. So i value more of my self thsn i value their ways, so i ise the tools i have. But when somone has a tool that give them reach and don’t use it, just like people working in the legal system, then it comes down to showing the ssme success jiurney story others have paved, just under a different light, cause others ways would tainten and contaminate mine. I wouldn’t do it all for money, but most would.