Protection — Protect I Or Not
Expression — Express I Or Not
Nourishment — Nourish Me, End. Not Tomorrow.

I had you there!

Because the moment we start applying the logic of SHS properly, we run into something rather unavoidable:

We could not leave people out.

And we could not even use the language of “Our People.”

SHS is a concession and a choice of humanity. If humanity recognises its benefit, then humanity should be entitled to it.

And if humanity does not?

Then I should be.

That is the point of my story.

We cannot cancel somebody out of our governance when SHS would belong to humanity and, with it, the majority.

That would be incoherent.

If I were to donate SHS to humanity, that would be my choice.

If I choose for it to remain a creative journey, then humanity can go to its politicians and ask them to build something similar. Not me — just an artist — carrying the responsibility that an existing political system has chosen not to carry.

That is the logic of humanity deflecting responsibility back onto the creator.

So at any given moment, if nobody else has done it, I can still be summoned to govern through SHS.

Not because I declared myself the ruler.

Not because I decided that I deserved the role.

Because perhaps nobody else has done it better.

And even then, there is a threshold.

I get to love my own life and humanity when we surpass 4 billion votes globally, or 34,640,500 in the UK, for me to do so.

Not a number before.

The majority needs to be the majority.

Half + 1 or nothing.

And if another country chooses to invoke that same possibility, then the same principle applies there too.

Half + 1.

Or nothing.

Until then, I am an artist, with a possible career in politics.

11:11 wishes

And that brings me to the three things underneath all of this:

Protection — Protect I Or Not

What does humanity actually want from me?

Because I cannot give you the obedient civilian in a faulty system.

I am not going to pretend that the purpose of a human being is simply to comply with whatever structures already exist.

But I can offer something else.

I can offer the investigation.

I can offer the creations.

I can offer the story.

I can offer a body of work that asks questions about reality, humanity, systems, perception, consciousness and the worlds we keep assuming are fixed.

That work was never created to exclude people.

Actually, quite the opposite.

It was investigation.

The impermeability of the character was part of that investigation: the metaphysical investigator moving through boundaries, examining what is real, what is constructed, what is experienced and what is assumed.

That happens to be my contribution to SHS.

It can become the next governance.

Or it can simply become a Magnum Opus film on its way to independence, cinema or Netflix, depending on the vision.

Humanity chooses.

And then we move accordingly.

Expression — Express I Or Not

This is also why SHS cannot coherently permit segregation, separation, division, isolation or the exclusion of particular people from its universe.

Everyone would eventually fall into that logic.

If SHS belongs to humanity, then the whole point is that humanity cannot construct another structure that reproduces the very divisions it claims to solve.

So what do you want from me?

A governance?

Or the story?

Because I can express.

I can create.

I can build worlds.

I can investigate them.

I can make something that leaves you looking at your own life differently.

Once you understand what a company values, you can better align yourself with what it perceives as extremely attractive to it — whilst still holding onto your own authenticity, your own story, your own purpose and your own vision.

That is not contradictory.

That is understanding the environment in which your work is being presented.

And honestly:

Don’t you think my story was worth Netflix’s platform?

Or was it worth the governance?

Again, humanity will choose.

And I will move accordingly.

I am, once again, giving humanity the chance to play me like a videogame.

Not through infinite options.

Through two gates.

Creative.

Governance.

Those are the gates.

Humanity gets to choose the continuum of my life.

Nourishment — Nourish Me End. Not Tomorrow.

And then there is the most immediate question of all:

How do we keep people alive while we are discussing everything else?

Food.

Water.

Shelter.

The things that cannot wait until tomorrow.

To my pals, plant lovers and farmers:

I see what you are doing.

Food is a necessity.

You work and fight for human survival, and the systems surrounding that survival have become increasingly complicated while the number of humans continues to grow.

We do not have infinite space for everyone to cultivate everything themselves.

We do not have infinite time to balance work, cultivation, rest and every other requirement of being human.

So why are the things required for survival treated in exactly the same way as ordinary opportunities for profit?

Everything in the chain of manufacturing and sustaining human necessities should have a cost understood through the fact that they are necessities.

And where a business exists to sustain something humanity fundamentally needs — water, food, shelter — that human necessity should be recognised in the economic structure itself.

My proposal is simple in principle:

Those who sustain human necessities should have their costs written off.

It helps the farmer who is doing everything traditionally to maintain quality on our tables.

It recognises the human necessity underneath the business.

And it humanises companies whose entire role is connected to things that people need in order to live.

Because nourishment cannot be:

“We will deal with that tomorrow.”

People need to eat today.

People need water today.

People need shelter today.

Human beings need to live today.

Not tomorrow.

So here is the poll

I am not choosing between these futures on humanity’s behalf.

You are.

So here it is.

By 12:05, 25 March 2027:

CREATIVE

or

GOVERNANCE

That is the choice.

I have made the work.

I have lived the story.

I have built the proposition.

I have put the two gates in front of humanity.

Now humanity gets to decide what happens next.

The choice is yours.

….

Now write this page for the blog, this is about : Protection(Protect I Or Not), Expression(Express I Or Not) and Nourishment(Nourish Me End. Not Tomorrow).

With that logic, we could not leave people out, and we cannot use the “Our People” either, as SHS is a concession and a choice of humanity, if humanity realises its benefit, it shojkd be entitled to it. If not, I should be, as my story.

We can’t cancel someon out of our governance, cause SHS would belong to humanity and with it the majority.

If I were to donate SHS to humanity, that si my choice. If I choose for jt to be a creative journey, they shiuld go to their politician to build something similar not me, just an artist, by the oogic of current humanity deflecting responsibility. Meaning at any given moment in time, if no one else can, I can be summoned to govern by SHS, as no one else might have done it better. I get to love my own kife and humanity when we surpass 4Billion votes if globally, or 34640500 in uk, for me to do so, not a number before. And if any other country, it would have to be the same, half +1 or nothing. The mjority needs to be the majority.

Until then I’m an artist with possible career in politics.

11:11 wishes
And now write a post with the title: ” i had you there! “.

It wouldn’t coherent of SHS, on top of the fact everyone would fall into it, to allow any type of segregation, separation, division, isolation or else, reason why if we were to look at the work done by me as the character, will be the impermeability, as the creations done under that character were the investigation and ways of the metaphysical investigator, which happens to be my contribution or donation to SHS, what will be either the next governance or simply a Magnum Opus movie on its way to independency or Netflix, depending on vision. Once you understand what a company values, you can better align yourself to what they perceive to be extremely attractive to them whilst holding onto your own authenticity, your story, your purpose, your vision… 

Don’t you think my story was worth Netflix’s platform?! Or was it worth the Governance?!

Again humanity will choose and we mill move accordingly. 
I’m again giving the chance to humanity to play me like a videogame. They get to choose my lide’s continuum, through only these two gates.

What does humanity want from me?! I can’t give you obedient civilian in a faulty system, but I can provide you with great art that will have you rethink your whole ife, beyond any fictionalised movie thag we all love, like inceotion, truman show and so many more. This is real life lived.

Or a gocernance that will have your back and with you at the forefront creste the best circumstances of living possible that we all deserve to experience, but have never really seen possible, nor hold faith and hope in seeing possible by 2030.
Great direction, resiurcefulness and perception can do anwful lot regardless of circumstances. If you put faurh in your understanding of what peace is, we can create it, as reality is really as malleable as inception and as theatrical as The Truman Show.

And to my pals plant lovers and farmers, as food is a necessity and you work and fight for our survival, everything in your chain of manufacturing should have a cost. It is survival based, it is a human need, and for the speed at which we’re griwing, we don’t have the space, all, to cuktivate plants or the time to balance enough rest. Those who sustain human necessities like water businesses, should have cost written off.
It helps the farmer that does everyrhing traditionally to hold onto quality on our tables and it is to humanise companies that use water, food and shelter, as ways of profit.

So here to you the poll that will choose the rest of my life. To 12:05 25th March 2027:

• Creative
• governance

The choice is yours.