Do I really need to step in court for this ruling? I can bet my life on it.. nah. But hey who am I to say I might win..right? Wright.

Only a random internet blackout or global power outrage can save them, but until when? When the light’s back up the truth will still be there to outshine lies. And if not deletion also leaves a trace…

And following up to that post, let’s write the next one. Since in the previous one I spoke about exposure and also added my own piece beyond the transcripted platforms, and the beautiful point that I made about water, that you only need to know that it’s water to know that it’s wet. Now, if you’re looking for whether it’s hot or it’s cold, that’s when you have to touch it, right? Now, obviously we know that both ice and steam—and sorry, and hot water—can steam based on the conditions of the room. So by sight, wetness, whether something is wet or it’s dry, you just gotta know. Water, are we looking at water? Of course it’s wet. Whether it’s iced or it’s hot, it’s always gonna be wet because that’s the natural essence of water. When we look at truth, you always know that truth will always be truthful when it’s rooted in truth, right? I have no problem in sharing my full-on digital footprint, my full-on digital trace history, everything, traffic, all of it. I have no issue with that. But all of those that have been made accountable, that have been reached out by me, that have looked at myself, that have, what’s it called, ignored it all, would they sustain a judge demanding for their digital footprint? Can they say, We did not know? Can they say, I did not understand? Can they say anything? Because understanding goes from exposure. If they haven’t exposed themselves thoroughly, they can’t actually have made an actual substantial judgment on the circumstances. But if they have and they’ve done nothing about it, then that makes them complicit to the exact same system that we’re actually challenging, that we were challenging. But obviously now in terms of creativity, in the creative aspect of it, that we are still challenging, right? Because the entertainment now, it’s a shortcut to challenging the governance, right? Can any of them sustain? I know that some of them did not click on any link, but I’ve had thousands on thousands that have repeatedly, back and forth, both in the present to when they were shared, and even afterwards, because there is links that have recently gone open that were links sent in the past. So that means that someone also came back to the blog itself. If I was to bring this claim in the court of law, of course it would be a ruling that a judge, in theory, in the right mind, would pass. Sure, let’s get the digital footprints. One could say, Well, there’s thousands of people that were involved. How can you ask thousands of people for their digital footprints? Well, are those thousands of people owning up to their own? Those that are owning up to their own will need to have that data shared. But those who are trying to fake not knowing, of course they would hesitate because it would expose their lack of action, their lack of care for actual contribution to humanity. So, really and truly, I don’t even need to step foot in the court to know that I’ve already won, because I know what my traffic would say. Would they? Well, of course they know what mine would say, but can they sustain the repercussions of their own truth? That is what the court of law cares about at the end of the day. That is what we’re really looking at. It’s the evidence of whether a ruling is substantial or not, you know?