Someome thinking: ” I didn’t expect anything to come out of it… ” Thought wrong. We’re still only starting.

Hi, um, is there any cases, for example, in the art world, how people get angst and do protests about the arts and how for them the CAC should be closed off because the art’s provocation is seen as pornography to them. Now, I am not necessarily condoning the art itself or anything. It’s a 50-50 thing. Like it is an artistic expression of something, and to be fair, the title of the art, of the piece itself, is quite literal. It is and does say that it is called provocation. Whether I believe it to be pornography or not, whether I believe it to be blasphemous or not, I don’t personally believe it to be blasphemous just because I understand the meaning that people put on blasphemy. It’s people using the Bible to act against what the Bible actually says, because the Bible says don’t look outside. The Bible says love thy neighbor. The Bible says those who follow Christ will be saved, and those who don’t won’t. But people take it upon themselves to enact what the Bible tells them and don’t actually enact the full landscape of what the actual Bible does and says. Now, I don’t condone the full expressions of the Bible. So, and in the same breath, I don’t condone the full expression of what art stands for, because it does allow the mind to travel and it can influence people to embody realities that might not be beneficial to the whole. But that is beside the point, because we’ve seen how arts might have you think about whatever the art takes out, but it is such a passive experience that it literally can take out anything from people’s minds. That’s the reality of things, because when we look at any form of quote-unquote art, whether it’s a song talking about bitches and alcohol and parties, or whether it’s porn, whether it’s TV shows, whether it’s even the most vanilla things, it’s a 50-50 responsibility. There is 50% responsibility on the creator and 50% responsibility on the audience, right? For everything. And because of it, I’m not necessarily not taking parts, I’m just taking parts, I’m taking consciousness part, not the two parts that are going up against each other, you know? The consciousness is unbiased, but also it’s about being conscious about the position that you take. It’s about understanding both sides and what you think of both, and saying neither side fully represents myself, so I don’t stand by either. But that is not necessarily not taking part. It’s taking part in something larger. Majority of people don’t recognize consciousness, so they don’t have the third option. They do have only the two parties, because in order to recognize consciousness, they have to actually have spent time learning, understanding, accepting the depth of consciousness. Most, if anything, none people do. So they don’t have the third option. I do, because it’s part of my job as a metaphysical expert, as a conscious being, a metaphysical writer, call it whatever. But it is beside the point, but it gives context, because what I’m looking for right now is what other events that people try and do all these protests for, like they invest so much energy into protests for something like this, but then they miss the point. They miss the larger point. And for some people, it might sound like censorship or things like that, but it’s merely, it’s be conscious about, it’s educating people about what we put in front of our eyes and each other’s eyes. That there are some expressions, there are some things that are more for the individual, and there are things that generally do educate others. But it has to be in an active, direct, clear-cut manner. Because if not, it allows the receiver to just confabulate whatever. That’s the reason why I’m so explicit about everything that I say, everything that I do, because I don’t believe in passivity in my creations, that is. In consciousness, in the ways in which I receive things, it’s not 100% passive, because I’m also exposing myself to the information. If it wasn’t for the fact that I would expose myself, I wouldn’t receive the notions or the crumbs that consciousness does relay. Yet when it comes down to… And the reason why I’m building so much context is because there is something at the back of my mind that does not necessarily bring any value to this conversation, but it’s something that I have discussed in the past. But it’s something that the energy of it, it’s coming up again. So it’s important that the context to where I stand for it presides. Now when it comes to how people are protesting about that, all those quote-unquote Christians— obviously this is a fictional characterization as to what the director thinks the religious groups might have reacted to something of that sort. But when we look at how people react to things already, they are so loud about all the things that might be wrong, but they never go to the source of all their problems, which is systematical. If you don’t fix the system, you cannot necessarily quote-unquote waste all of that energy on things that are only allowed to exist because the system is built in a specific certain way. You know? It’s miseducation, but it’s also misdirection of energy, in the sense that if one is attacking both the system and the individuals that are upholding the system, I’ll 100% back that up. You know? If someone is only attacking the individuals within the system, that’s when I take a step back, because it’s not conducive. The people have some power, but not the whole power. You know? And that’s why the 50-50, it’s the best. And obviously I understand that these words might also incite uprisings, but the reality of things is that if we don’t do something, if we don’t awaken people, if we don’t have people putting their energies in the right places, directed in the right places, we’re never going to change this world. There’s too many people that use the past to excuse not doing anything in the present, which does not actually fix the problem. It just continuously regurgitates the exact same circumstances that we live by and feel the consequences of. You know? So for those cases where people are attacking whatever the case might be, it’s just not congruent. It’s not coherent. It’s not conducive. It’s not cohesive. It’s just not. It’s not the best strategy possible. The best strategy possible is to Educate people about the foundations of the system, and in doing so, understanding what actually is in the power of the people to be able to do something about it, instead of excusing the fact that, Oh, we are powerless, because power is given and taken. If someone feels powerless, they’re the ones who are taking away their own power. No one is powerless. Everyone is powerful. It’s whether someone acknowledges it or not. That is the difference, you know? Everyone is powerful because everyone has a chance to contribute to something, to say something, to do something, you know? Like UK subways says it perfectly: If you see something, say something, you know? Those that don’t become almost like complicit to it, to whatever is happening. And at the same time, there is also the fact that when it comes to things that are rooted in the system and the ways in which it is being upheld, it is all of our responsibility to do something about it. If we don’t do something about it, we are accepting it to be just. We are accepting it to be right. We’re accepting it to be the best way possible for us to do life, even if it is not. And the reason why I say we’re accepting it is because doing nothing does not remove your responsibility. If anything, it’s a detractor, because it actually makes the space that could have been filled by someone’s responsibility, it makes it null, which makes it a minus, because it becomes a lack within something that could have been invested in. It becomes a lack because, and it’s almost like the excuse that politics uses: Oh, you didn’t vote, now it’s your fault if the Prime Minister is X, Y and Z. Well, really and truly, apart from the fact that voting is the scam, they do put pressure on people to vote because that’s the only way how they can get any type of consensus, even if it’s not the consensus to the whole thing, because they never asked for consensus to the whole thing. Then it also makes it so that the few people that do vote are the ones who dictate which head of the same beast leads. But the beast is the same. Voting does not change the beast. It does not change the system. It only chooses which head to represent it. You know? That is the mentality. So if we look at things from outside of the system, choosing which system to have represent us is the way forward, because it’s the only way that humanity can actually be represented consciously. And this is not me partaking into any campaign, political campaign, if not to actually educate people, because if a campaign, a conscious campaign, was to, that’s rooted in consciousness, that’s rooted and is the best option possible for humanity, there is nothing that I would do to not contribute to it. And the reason why is because the goal will be the same: to build something that humanity can consciously experience and consciously benefit from, away from a system that is already quite destructive, you know? But most don’t see it that way, so most don’t really understand the power that their contribution has, because they place a sense of hopelessness upon themselves. They’re not really feeling hopeless. They’re telling themselves that they are hopeless, or they’re believing to be hopeless— sorry, not hopeless, helpless. They’re believing to be helpless. They’re believing that they don’t have the power to have a say. They’re believing that they don’t have the power to do something. And that is the biggest issue possible. The biggest issue that we’re still in 2026 experiencing.