Why do we teach what should come naturally? Or why are we putting naturally talented and practiced talents in the same industry, they shoukd be separated.

Someonething that’s natural and is an art of expression should be entirely. One cannot say art is all about expression, so it should not be capped, mandated or have stronger boundaries, and then go and have teachings on its perfectionism. The two are not the same as one is performance and one is expression.

Naturality cannot be used as excuse. Practice cannot be used as excuse. Perfecting cannot be used as excuse… simply cause you can’t have it both ways.

If we allow schools about it we should also allow laws about what gets produced, you can’t allow to provide the foundations and then give freefall freedom to those who can taint the mind of chikdren, adults and elders. The mind is our greatest foundation of observation, it is the tool we use to ground and regulate emotions. Even a weeds in there can tain the production of how we go about our emotions. Sponsorships should not be allowed in art if art is all about the expression. Competitions either… but they all are. So which one is it?! If it is a business, then let’s not call it creative, let’s call it strategic art, if it is art, let’s remove the excesses and go back to when expression was about rawness, not getting a deal..

People want to sepratae transgender women from biological women, I don’t see why no one advocates for the natural in creative works.