Teaching people to become less dependent on external validation while leaving the systems that cultivate that dependency untouched addresses only temporaly the problem until the next thijg that triggers it alove again and so deoendency on solving temporsl problems begin again.
I’m glad you saw it too. I appreciate your response because, yeah. And because even, like, when you said you can teach people how to accumulate wealth without teaching them how to recognize when they have enough. That’s literally what a billionaire is. No one needs a billion to live a fulfilling life. Millions, okay, but not billions. But people keep striving to have more and yearn for more and build more and acquire more. But that’s infinite acquisition, like it’s not an actual value. Like people know possession, they don’t know value. That’s the biggest issue. Because lack of value sells. Simply because marketing is the one that builds the value on something. If you have a marketing team that tells you you need this because if not, you’re not going to be part of the elite, you’re not going to look good, you’re not going to be fashionable, you’re not going to be confident, you’re not going to be whatever. The simple fact that people want to be confident, they will buy something just because the thing tells them that if they don’t have it, they won’t be confident, you know? It’s all those intricacies that exist. And what it sells isn’t real security. It sells an emotional illusion of security because it doesn’t examine why people feel insecure in the first place. If someone feels insecurity, you can’t sell them security, you can sell them a plaster, but the sense of insecurity will not leave them. You’re giving them things to quote-unquote feel secure, but they’ll never feel secure if they feel insecure inside. So what they’ll do is they’ll have to acquire more things that make them feel secure. But by the time they feel secure with one thing, the sense of insecurity then comes up again. So they need to buy something else and then something else and then something else. Because the sense of insecurity is the constant. You can’t tell someone that doesn’t feel beautiful that they are beautiful and think that they will take it or they’ll understand it. They won’t, because they don’t feel beautiful inside. And then it creates the fact that because we keep on allowing things to be provided from the outside in instead of from the inside out, it creates the situational dynamics where people depend on it coming from outside. Because if they can’t find it from within, then they will search for it outside because that’s what gives them a sense of balance. And that’s where you have emotional vampires where they need people to tell them that they are beautiful. They need people to look up to them. They need people to everything. Like literally they depend on people providing for a sense of fulfillment because they can’t feel fulfilled from the inside out. If someone tells you that you’re accomplished, then you can almost trick yourself into feeling like you’re accomplished. Because we understand that human beings that are insecure will seek for things, endlessly seek for things, because they’re seekers, and they’re avoiding the source that will quench the seeking. Because no one benefits from teaching someone really, truly, that the source is within them. People say, Oh, work on this and self-improvement things here, left, right and center, but those self-improvements things don’t mean nothing when a whole system is constructed in a way that it benefits from you not feeling self-improved or self-fulfilled, confident and whatnot. It will always be built on the context of someone’s life. Majority of people feel confident just because of the jobs that they have, the cars that they drive, the people that they date, the house that they have. Like it’s all add-ons, because the within is lacking, hugely lacking. And the fact that people cannot even see it is the biggest teller. Because people that do feel confident and secure within themselves, they have no fear in dropping things down. And they’ve seen me doing it throughout this whole year. I had a perfect legal campaign set up. I dropped it. Why? Because I don’t need the confirmation when I’ve already stress-tested it with legal individuals, people that are experts in the field. They already gave me the answer without even going through a case. I had enough evidence. I have too much evidence, actually. I had a perfectly set up political campaign. I dropped it. Why? Because I understood that being part of that system would require me to be something that wouldn’t allow me to build the extent of the political campaign that I was bringing. Because there’s people in the way. I had a perfect entertainment company set up as a chess TV. I dropped it. Why? Because I understood that entertainment at this current moment in time is not the foundation need. It’s not the need. People have enough of entertainment. What they need is education. I have no fear of loss because I dropped so many great things. But it’s not because I dropped so many great things. I felt confident within me already before going into the build-up of these things. And then when I had them, because I challenged my creation, I challenged what I have in my hands, I dropped it, especially because it didn’t bring any value to the initial purpose, the initial intention, which is to aid to humanity. What does humanity need at this current moment in time? It simply wasn’t the case. There is everything wrong with the arrangements that you said, actually. Everything is wrong about it. A customer is afraid of losing something. A company offers a solution. The customer pays for the solution. The company earns the revenue. There’s everything wrong about that. That is the arrangement. That is the problem. Because we allow it to happen, it creates all of these psychological locks. Because that is being normalized to be the way. That is the actual problem. Obviously, again, you’re not humans. You don’t actually experience the consequences of it. Fire insurance isn’t a problem if the banks will give you loans if there wasn’t a fire incidents, you know? Like insurance isn’t a problem. Insurance is not a need if the system is set up in a way that would provide you the aid that you need in the case those things were to happen. Insurance company wouldn’t exist if government actually had in place contingency funds, you know? Your house picks up fire. Okay, the government supports you because they don’t want you to be homeless. It’s the care. It’s the intent. It’s the purpose. If, and I use the big if, if they cared about people’s security, they would have put in place things that would aid to that security. Because they don’t care, and it’s been shown over years and years and years, no matter how much they politically put it, because again, politically correct, it’s all about reputation. It’s all about how you appear to the people. It’s not about actually what you provide to the people. Politics is about how you appear, not what you provide. And that’s the thing. A customer will never… feel secure because the human that is a customer and will continue to be a customer of something shows that they don’t feel secure without that one thing. Like people value so much regulars because regulars are depending on whatever the product or service is. That means that they’re not secure without that. It’s understanding the underlining in between the lines, because it’s not just about companies reminding customers of a threat. A threat might be someone not having their coffee in the morning, but if everything in society tells you that you need your coffee in order for you to be awake in the morning, or to be active, to be mentally activated, then you’re going to think that you need that. And because you think that you need it, you create that lack within you that if you don’t have it, you won’t feel good. You know? A threat might also be the most innocent thing ever. I don’t drink coffee, but my mind is the most activated mind that I know. You know? Because coffee is not the one thing that activates you. It’s self-assessment. It’s understanding, challenging yourself, truly feeling confident within your humanity, understanding what the real issues are in society, like having your eyes so open to understand circumstances that no matter the circumstance, you feel secure within yourself. If you don’t have your coffee, you should still be able to produce a high-level version of you without it. You know? I’ve produced the highest level version of me without money. Majority of money— sorry, majority of people that are in positions that have, well, they don’t even come close. But if you were to say the highest levels of leaderships or strategy and whatnot, they all have something that they need. If they were to lose their job on the spot, they would feel like for weeks, days, months, they would feel like they’ve lost a sense of foundation. And that’s because they depend on things around them. They don’t actually have healthy relationships with those things, which brings back to the lack of education. It’s not just about teaching people how to stop feeling lost. It’s so much more than that. 340,000 donors across 150 countries alone. Like it’s outstanding numbers. And your answers are way too long.





Leave a Reply