This one specifically is such a beautiful evidence tip of an iceberg of its own, and too many have sailed onto that Titanic. Everything is retraceable, unless the whole internet goes down….. every industry had a cross. They buried it and it turned into a seed. Who could possibly benefit from a blackout if not the same ones who run from accountability the most?

This is for those who don’t face their own accountsbility and spam tag you before they know hiw to account their own contintuity and lack of integrity.

— SNW

Here’s another fascinating question.

WHO GAVE PEOPLE THE POWER TO INFLUENCE WHETHER OTHERS RECEIVE INFORMATION SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T LIKE WHAT WAS SAID?

Spam protections were created to protect people from unwanted, deceptive and malicious communications.

But what happens when someone marks an email as spam, not because it is fraudulent, but because they dislike being held accountable?

And what happens when those reports influence whether entirely different recipients ever see the sender’s work?

I have experienced people rejecting my accountability correspondence, and I question what consequences spam reporting may have had for my other communications.

Imagine a neuroscientist missing early access to my research into coordinator resonance because an unrelated recipient disliked being challenged.

Imagine potentially valuable discoveries in neuroscience, biology or healthcare being overlooked because information was filtered before it could even be evaluated.

SINCE WHEN DID SOMEONE’S DISCOMFORT BECOME A MEASURE OF INFORMATION’S VALUE?

Who governs these reporting mechanisms? Who audits malicious or retaliatory spam complaints? Who investigates their consequences for innocent third-party recipients?

AND WHO HOLDS THE GATEKEEPERS ACCOUNTABLE WHEN THEIR SYSTEMS BECOME INSTRUMENTS OF OBSTRUCTION?

Because protecting someone from harmful communication is one thing.

ALLOWING SOMEONE’S DISLIKE OF ACCOUNTABILITY TO POTENTIALLY OBSTRUCT KNOWLEDGE THAT COULD BENEFIT HUMANITY IS SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY.

And that distinction deserves investigation.

— Susan Ndinga-Wright SHS – Human First