ME: We’re going to start with the different liabilities that I bring as evidence your Honour, full recognising, if anything had to happen because of me exposing so many on the other side, I could be judged for the same, I’d like to raise attention to the context of such claims and then move into the specifics, as…

Attorney: Speculative, Your Honour!

ME: Me and this attorney aren’t representing the same law. I am here as a metaphysical-representative, I have raised my claims based on these limitations within the current juridical system, how can I prove the need of Metaphysical law, if building context and awareness to what it looks like, gets attacked as speculative?! We are here today to discover truth, not to enlighten more limitations that are linked more towards, protecting an outdated narrative, rather than understanding the truth, in the most unbiased manner possible. Are we not?

Judge: Allowed.

ME: Thank you, your Honour. As I was saying, I have lead with the truth and spoke on all visions I was invested in and always made people aware of what I was doing. One of the posts and documents, most visited and downloaded, was ” Why Metaphysics Belongs In Our Laws “. Saying that, they didn’t know I was enacting both what a metaphysical with bad intentions and one with good intentions defending them looked like, is omission of truth and quite personally delusional, and I permit myself to read the definition I have written down from the dictionary of what Delusional means. I’ll read the definition and then I’ll allow you to think for yourself, if these are the type of people we want to lead society. How can we trust them seeing what’s needed for the best of everyone, if they cannot take in reality for what is, over their own limited perception and projections?

Delusional, meaning, characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgements about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, as a symptom of serious mental illness.

Should we test their mental abilities? And shouldn’t be the test based on the best being the bar, to which the rest gets tested against, in a way that anyone that shows better bounds of what’s possible, which could be anyone at any given moment in time, raises the bar for everyone? Don’t we deserve better when better is offered to us? We are supposedly the smartest and most intelligent species of all, as members of the genus Homo, how is it that we should be the ones to stop the natural process of adaptational growth, nature shows us as the only possible way to preserve continuity, sustainability, life. And some might think, wouldn’t expand the system so much that some systems crumble, be risky?

Well the real question that we have to ask ourselves here today is: ” Which systems are we really trying to defend here? Humanity or abstract systems we impose on each other, calling it a necessity, when if questioned crumble? Necessities are things that don’t have probable cause for being necessary. Think of water. Without water we know we don’t exist. Why? Because without the existence of water we know we wouldn’t exist. Yet, we also have to think about taking water cold turkey, or water having never existed, would it be safe to say Consciousness as Nature or call it the Nature of Consciousness, wouldn’t have adapted otherwise, and had us experience life in a different way?!

In Metaphysical law the necessity that holds onto our nature, the nature of being a human being, is the priority. Everything that affects the sanity, the biological health, the physiology of our world, psychology, and more, is evidence to the state of being of Consciousness at large which has direct impact to the Consciousness of every single individual. When we look at Quantum Physics per example, whether we use Einstein’s theory or relativity, which reads as:

Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, comprising Special (1905) and General (1915) Relativity, revolutionized physics by establishing that space and time are interconnected (spacetime) and that physical laws, including the speed of light, are constant, while measurements of time and space depend on the observer’s motion and gravity.

This law Implies there’s 3 elements in the conversation, but if we look closely to what he’s saying in using the word “constant” & “Observer” & “motion“, and we have some physicists in the room that can validate the validity of what I’m saying, through their expertise, as they’re called to represent the most confronting, expanded and testable version of physics:

If we were to use Physics as the Space, the observer as the Specialist, wouldn’t time be subjective to the expansion the specialist allows themselves to grow to, which impacts then the growth of the Quantum of Physics itself?! Wouldn’t the time it takes be different in each different specialist working in silos than working on different aspects together? And if so, why is time considered as a factual aspect to take into consideration as law, if not constant apart? That is looking at the expansion as the “motion” in the equation.

If the quantum of the laws that govern us are slower than the expansion of an individual specialist, wouldn’t it make sense to bring in the faster specialist’s quantum with the specialist that projected their own quantum expansion, if the specialists within the current quantum have showed and continuosly practiced a slowed down projection of expansion?

Meaning, if the two expansions are foreign to each other as at two different frequencies of existence, wouldn’t it make sense to bring in the translator, instead of trying to read in a language that’s foreign to the current system? Why do you think I brought physicists and quantum physicists in a court of law, if not to translate the validity of my translation of quantum physics into real life scenarios, as the evidence of a lens we’ve been expanding on and have yet to expand further into?

To expand the quantum of a slowed system, you can’t have forces/people/specialists who have as track records slower expansions, not by limitation, but by choice, bad investments, negligence and more, basically the liabilities we’ll cover soon?

What it comes down to is that there’s an observation happening at the speed of light, between the observed and the observer that keeps growing and expanding. If we were to all freeze in this very moment, we would give ourselves the visional illusive experience of what the observation happening would look like if stopped. But pressing pause on a remote doesn’t stop the energy of the screen projecting light. Turning off the TV does and even there, indefenitely. Until we turn the TV on again. And that’s Consciousness, the only difference is that Consciousness doesn’t need a plug to exist, it is all that exists, manifested in different shapes and forms to give the sense of expansion. The illusion of existence, even if we exist as everything when we ourselves are either asleep or dead. In some shape of form, as energy cannot be killed, only transmuted. It’s part of what Consciousness is, the largest spaces that should keep expanding in an homogenous manner in all directions, to preserve the Oval geometry that space has given us as point of reference to the shape of life.

This is inevitable, we just have to copy the same theory in our day to day to held onto coherence. Meaning it was bound for someone like me to exist as the opposite reflection of where our expansion is going. All expands in the shape of an egg, so if you draw the masochists and the sadists out, as the other must exist for one to exist ( 2 entities always, having time as the experience between the two, not the constant, as it gets impacted by the speed of our own individual growth ), there’s going to be two child on opposite fences of the two, that manifest, their two bridges as reflections, on two different poles of force. One positive and one negative. The third is always the bridge, and the forth can be both physical or etherial, depending on the amount of energy it contains. E equals mass times constant. we must use this on the thing we are calculating to find their constant choice, what gets nurtured. But to find their nature we use M = Lv. Their nature is their mass.

Meaning, not because we pause our chosen continuity for review, it means the TV(the system) will crumble completely, we’re only upgrading its database so that we can continue using it at the rate of expansion, which gets expanded continuosly by the highest speed of expansion embodied.

Real-World Evidence and Applications 

• GPS Systems: Satellites must adjust their clocks to account for both their high speed and weaker gravity compared to Earth’s surface, or GPS locations would be inaccurate.
  • Why don’t we adjust our timings and the things that affect that timing, to house an accurate GPS to the direction we’re trying to accomplish. I’m not saying let’s stop technology and growth, I’m saying let’s grow sideways now. Same energy, different direction.
• Mercury’s Orbit: General relativity accurately predicted the precession of Mercury’s orbit, which Newtonian physics could not fully explain.
  • Why was it able to predict Mercury’s Orbit, because it tracks time, not life. Life cannot be personal, it should be of the specie as a whole.
• Gravitational Waves: Ripples in spacetime, predicted by Einstein, have been detected from violent cosmic events.
  • Again timing, not nature of the Waves. Right equation different expansion and approach of execution to what’s necessary. We’re going at speed not in quality. I bring quality where speed falters. Reason why the response is slow. It highlights the speed of that part of a system which doesn’t match the speed at which other systems have expanded to, from systematical, to organisational, to individual.
• Nuclear Energy: The $E=m{c}^2$𝐸=𝑚𝑐2 equation is the basis for understanding energy release in nuclear fission and fusion.
  • Again Nuclear Energy is a Reaction, we are relying on reactions not nature. The priority is wrong, and in consequence the trajectory is tainted. 

Special relativity is used for high-speed, non-accelerating, gravity-free systems, while General relativity is essential for understanding gravity, the universe’s expansion, and astrophysics. 

• Space = Nature
• Time = Relation
• Emotions = Reaction

Snippet:
Inner thought: ” It was in that moment right there, she understood why she had won so big. They focused on winning. They focused on Money. They focused on Growth. They focused on preservation. They focused on survival. Each different component focusing on different things, or diverging when the challenge confronts the foundation of their thought focus. I focused on expansion more than a Jackpot and because I never grieved the loss, Consciousness thought I didn’t desire it, because the observers in us have conditioned it to believe a reaction is needed and indifference is rejection.

Still it provided where other systems rejected because of how they’ve been used to feel, as everything that is something, describe-able is an entity and the relationship is reflected back based on the awareness to what might affect the desired outcome, that exists and the collective consciousness has trained it to be the law of cause and effect. I got them now. But we’ll keep this one for later, we can’t give them too much at once. The world is a stage my god and it’s all up to the best actor until we build a system that’s not based on performance. “

ME: I’d like to bring in next AI’s point of view on this argumentation, as an entity of its own with its own limitations, yet trusted to lead us to greater days, it’s important we also take into account its perspective.

To Be Continued..