It’d require too much responsibility and they are emotionally not well versed with it, as they only seen conservative ways of being at home. If you put a child under a bell, don’t be surprised if they shout fire when they see the sun.

If the problem is kids bodies being butchered, than what friction has them believe thry should in thr first place, where’s their identity not rrpresented or allowed free reigns, so that the solution doesn’t become, let me where a new suit. It is about the sense of acceptance, belonging and respect for individuality, not about the skin shape, nor about a chirurgical matter. People feel out of body 24/7 for different reasons, feeling like a man in the body of a woman, can be expressed as building things that woukd have been accustomed to men building them, it doesn’y hsve to be a whole change of life…

I just heard possibly the nicest quote phrase by Kit Porter in episode season three The L World, episode nine with Max, where Max is about to go through the gender transformation, and it links with what I was saying before about nurture and the lack of it isn’t male or female, especially at this current moment in time.

She say, not verbstim ” If I felt white inside and one day I had the possibility to change my skin from black to white, would you encourage me? Would that solve my actual problem? (She alluded to the fact that the feeling is a standalone one, the body doesn’t create it, but it reinforces a cage that’s put on the free expression of a mind that doesn’t want to be limited by the body they have. It’s the same feeling we have of wanting to be immortal, yet have to face mortalith everyday, remembering it is something we have not yet qualified for.)

The problem is societal, yet because it is so ingrained into the lives that we have built to believe to be the way things should be, there’s too many kids who feel like they cannot express their masculinity. Too many girls who feel that they cannot express their masculinity outwardly, that think that the issue is their body. The issue is not their body. They can be recognized as more masculine and have the space to be and do masculine things. The discomfort comes from not being allowed certain things because certain things are attached to a gender. Historically, things are attached to a gender, and because the history of humanity lives in the eggs of humanity, as it passes through the mitochondrial memory of the mother, the child already knows that the world has female and male distinctions. But it comes that every egg is an opportunity for new, not to relive the old. So the child already comes expanded away from that, and then it meets a system that treats it like something that it doesn’t want to be, because we’ve created systems that are attached to a gender, and that was the mistake that I would have made if I had gone through the make women the leaders. It’s not about making women the leaders. It’s about making the maternal energy the leader, because the maternal energy, whether it’s found in a man or whether it’s found in a woman, is the energy that we need in order to create civilizations that are more caring, more nurturing. And I say that just because I’ve gone through it myself. There was a period in time when I was a child when I wasn’t allowed to play football, that I started questioning whether I should change my body. I started envying men in the couple of years of, like, teenagehood, well, just before teenagehood actually. It was around seven years old, and because I couldn’t play football, I started questioning maybe I should be a boy then. And then I started telling me, well, fortunately enough, at least I was allowed to play football outside in the courtyard with my friends, just not professionally, and that still allowed me the chance to ground myself and find love in the body that I was given. But if I wasn’t allowed to even play in my courtyard, possibly all that time that I would have spent playing, I would have spent indoors just thinking, Oh, I want to be a boy. I should be a boy, and whatever. And that chatter would have naturally created a dialogue, a discordance with the body that I had, a hand. And I would have allowed a societal projection to had me question my own identity, when really and truly it wasn’t supposed to ever be that way. And that is to say that if we don’t loosen the ways in which we are to represent humanity, not to represent the categories that we place within humanity, we will have everyone questioning their identities and sense of identity, thinking that the friction that they’re finding is within themselves, when really it’s a systematic friction. The only reason why I started questioning if I should be a woman or a man is because football was represented more and respected more when played by men. But football is football regardless of who plays, or regardless of who kicks the ball. The sport itself stands alone. So that goes for also our systems. It’s not about the boardroom being filled with men or filled with women. It’s about the consideration. If decisions are impacting women, then the women should be the ones to have the say. That’s why we’ve built SHS to be a 55% last final decision to humanity and only 45% to the company itself and the leadership board and whatnot. The reason why is because we want to provide the sense of authority that only the rich people have had access to, to make decisions that impact their humanity and the humanity of everyone that benefits from the systems that live within it, or exist within it, meaning that everyone within SHS will have a dashboard where all decisions relating SHS get posted as they are being questioned, as they are being cited or in process of analysis, so that the individuals can both look at the different reasonings that get given. They can see the different ongoings of decision making, and at any given moment in time they can add their own perspective to the matter. So we will create it in a way that there’s also a chance for feedback, and then we will collect the feedback. We will have someone that specifically just looks at the feedback that comes from people and represents the perspective of the majority, the perspective of humanity. And that creates a system where humanity is recognized, not female or men are recognized. And we need that more than anything else, because too many kids are growing thinking that they should be something, when really and truly the only thing they should be is to be allowed to be their full-on self as the human that they were born as. It’s not about stopping people from butchering their bodies. It is about building systems where we actually do tend to the people that we have in our system so that they feel like they are accepted, that they belong, and that they are allowed to be who they are by nature, like the given. So, like, we should build systems that respect humans as they come, as they get out of the womb. That’s how we should build for, not in the sense of how they come from the womb as men or female, but the totality of their life, because if they come to the world through the womb, is to have a full life. So we should take into account for their possible full lives and expand where a life finds a boundary within the system, because then we gotta look at: is this something that the system will encounter more of? If yes, then we cater to it. If it’s one, what’s it called, if it’s only one perspective that doesn’t necessarily be a pattern, then we look at how can we care about this in the now, and how do we prepare if it was to be a pattern or become a pattern, no matter the when. It could be a hundred years from now. If this does become a pattern, then how do we cater for that? Like imagine if the world had catered for Jesus Christ. Like the world would be very much different. Not just catered to the lack of Jesus Christ, but if they had catered to the possible appearance of another Jesus Christ, you know? How would the world be, or how should the world be to incentivize, to build, to bring and attract another Jesus Christ? That’s how the world should have been. Now, subconsciously we did exactly that, but we did it from the opposite route. We built what’s unholy and marketed it as holy, instead of actually building what’s holy so that it stands alone as holy regardless of what people say about it, basically.