~ Know thy self enough to see your own cloth of society and only then you can free yourself from it. That’s the death that’s needed, not physical death or whatever else, but the death of something that has not been working for a very long time. ~

And as a perfect follow-up to that one, we have to make a clear distinction about what is human being, what is systematic human being. So one that is formed by the system. So their ideologies, their sense of self, their likings, their choices, they’re all influenced by the mere system in which we live in currently, the one that’s dying, the OVO, old world order, and the life of a conscious, well, an individual, a human being that is conscious of being consciousness incarnated. And the difference is quite staggering, because the two behave completely different, in the sense that the first one, the human being developed by society, is the human being that lives by whatever clique or industry or whatever they think their identity is about. But they don’t necessarily touch or attach the identity to their humanness, meaning that their humanness is to be consciousness incarnated in matter, to be energy that’s having and creating the experience that life is in its wholeness. All parts of it are a creation, as we are creating the experience of life. Both manifesting it, because we are consciousness incarnated. So we are consciously manifesting the world in which we live in, but also through active contribution, in the sense of, okay, now we’re in matter, but we also are contributing to the experience that we have on a day-to-day basis in terms of both everything that goes into living on Earth as a human being. The individual that’s developed by the system is an individual that doesn’t know how to integrate the fact that they are pure energy compressed into matter. They don’t know how to live by it because they are attached to everything that they find a sense of belonging to. They don’t feel belonging to just being energy in matter. So they find things to define themselves through or in. How do I explain this in a way that is so obvious to see the difference between the two? So the conscious human being that knows that they’re just simply energy moves through it all like it’s nothing, and at the same time doesn’t attach to any aspect of life. If anything, it only attaches to the concept that reinforces energy matter. They’re not fazed by career, their career, the money that they have. They’re not fazed by anything societally practiced or accepted. And society can easily add what they perceive to be into it. So I coined it, for example, anti-social behaviors. But it’s not anti-social behaviors, it’s anti-society behavior, meaning that it clearly recognizes that society doesn’t lead by its actual being, its actual essence, its actual origin, and it exposes itself to everything because it knows that it is everything and everyone. So there’s no fear of loss. There’s no fear, because they understand that it is everything, and even if it was to die, it would still be everything. Because the human developed by society is the one that fears death, fears endings, fears, yeah, fears endings. Because physical death is only the extreme of endings of relationships, endings of jobs, endings of stability, ending of anything, literally. The fear of that is highly just not highly. It is the human being that’s being developed by society. The conscious being knows that it is everything. Society contributes to what it is, but it doesn’t make it so. So it builds through society for the wholeness of it all, because it understands that it is the wholeness of it all, and the wholeness of it all is the one that is manifesting the dynamics that it lives by. Meaning, or more, a clearer example of it: I build through society for the wholeness of society, not for society, but for the wholeness of consciousness. That is what it is to be a human being that’s conscious of being energy incarnate and understands the movement of energy. So when I am posting something that’s, like, very, very something that’s hard for the human being developed by society, I find there is, like, hiccups, whether it’s a phone breaking or the internet suddenly goes off, or, like right now as I’m speaking, the wind just picked up in speed and loudness, or suddenly the platform that I’m using is, like, it’s stuck, or people start shouting, or loud music starts going. Like every time that I’m creating something that reinforces the piece of consciousness, that creates discomfort in the human being that’s developed by society, I know that the energy that’s happening and occurring is because the individual that’s raised by society will find it hard to take it in. So the hiccups happen in a way to try and stop it from it being released. That is the conscious being that understands the co-creation and co-manifestation of the reality and the things that happen in the day-to-day. Whereas the individual raised by society Even there, the moment I said raised by society, the transcript stopped. And now as I picked it up again, the wind picked up again. All those things are the co-creation of the energies of those who will be on the other side reading it, in trying to either distract the flow of this energy coming out, or stopping it from exposing parts of itself that it hadn’t thought of nor challenge, because it would have challenged the developments that they would have gained in society through society. And it also allows you to see every individual in the stream society to be still an embodiment of society. Like even the most abstract, like religion and spiritualism, they’re still, when you look at it properly, not through the lenses of society but through the lenses of consciousness, they’re still very much so systematical ones, systematical embodiments of it, because they live by the industry, not by their human-ness, their human essence. And that tells you this person, this individual, this organization— well, organization is still a group of individuals— so this energy is living by society, not living by consciousness. Simply because it doesn’t expose itself to all consciousness, because it segments what is conscious, or is accepted, or what is good slash bad, basically. Because again, those are lenses of society. Because the human being that’s developed in society believes that there is such a thing as good and bad, and so tries to erase the bad, or tries to undo the bad, or tries to hide the bad, or tries to just avoid the bad from either happening or from existing, and in doing so tries to erase energies that clearly haven’t found grounding yet. So they manifest in a quote-unquote bad way, because it is everything that is, by socially, through the lenses-wise, bad, is an exposure of an energy that exists that people are avoiding. To the conscious being raised in consciousness, in matter, sees it as that is a data point energy, that is an energy that’s highlighting something else, that might or might not be in direct correlation to it. I look at genocide and I see ignorance of not knowing and realizing that it is a group of individuals who have housed narratives delivered by society and embodying those narratives in partaking into genocides. It is not the individual that is bad; it is the development that the individual has had. So the responsibility is on the system, because the system, as we’ve already highlighted in so many different ways, shapes, forms, and instances, has so many different ways and shapes, form, and instances that don’t actually relay the real essence of life or the real essence of what something is, or doesn’t even challenge the origin of where something comes from, or what influence is it. That is being a conscious being, not a human being developed by society. Is to see the correlation with everything, because everything that society sees to be bad is there to show to society how bad its state of consciousness is. Because it tries to erase so many things and tries to hide so many things. Those things happen elsewhere. If I’m talking about dismantling all of a society that is this harmful, I’m going to experience disharmony, because that is the counterbalance to me trying to end an energy. It’s part of the process, but that does not mean that the process itself is bad. It’s bad only for those Who don’t want it to end because whether they benefit from it, whether it’s because that’s all they know and they don’t know how to exist beyond there, or because they fear the exposure to aspects of themselves that they haven’t accepted yet, or whatever the case might be in that regards.. And then the wind literally just roared, and now even more. Lol. Honestly, it makes me laugh, but hey. This is universal telepathy. This is elemental telepathy. It is communicating with the actual energy field that we live through. And it being one, it houses the energy of all. So if I’m doing or saying something that brings disharmony to someone else, I’m going to experience and see the display of that disharmony in this field because of it. So if I see disharmony when I’m creating something that is quite powerful to the system of the human developed by the system, that is just confirmation. To me, disharmony is confirmation that what I’m doing and what I’m creating is actually working because it’s telling me that the energy of their future self experiencing it will be experiencing the cognitive dissonance of having to hold a system that is everything that they know and seeing it being dismantled in front of them. And that really only shows also how deep-rooted their roots are in the very same system that doesn’t recognize their humanity, and because of it, they will lose their sense of humanity. And when I say or use the word terminology of humanity, humanity is only a physical manifestation of consciousness. It’s a physical representation of consciousness, actually, and also, yes, a physical manifestation. But manifestation is only, if we were to explain it through the process of physics or science, it’s only an alchemical process that goes from one state to another. And mathematically, it’s like one plus one equals two. It’s the exact same aspect and understanding of consciousness in matter equaling humanity, because the one is the consciousness of consciousness, and the second one is matter. So that is two different aspects coming together into one, and they form a union. So it’s divide and conquer, and then union and conquer. Consciousness had to divide itself first from ethereal and matter to then reunite in the human being. That’s why the human being was the last natural creation, whereas everything else came before it. And then the human creation went to, instead of creating for the ecosystem that it was brought to represent, it started creating beyond the ecosystem. So it started creating away from what was naturally created for the experience of consciousness that lowered itself into matter to be conscious in matter. So as of now, consciousness has died in me. Sorry, not as of now, it died in me upon birth, but I’m also the only one that’s carrying consciousness through life, because everyone else is carrying the consciousness of a system that’s not the consciousness of consciousness. It’s the consciousness of those who had some conscious aspects to them, enough to think and create something that could reverberate through time. And vibration, reverbering, reverberation—I don’t know the actual word, the noun for reverb, sorry, the adjective for reverb, or the verb for reverb, reverbering, I guess—is what we live in now. But it started prior, and if it was maintained with the conscious mind of creation at point of creation, it would have meant assessing things as beginning and end to it in the now. That won’t make sense to many people, I can feel it. But it links to what I said about maintenance, of maintaining something is to maintain it as the consciousness that created it. And right now we are only maintaining the consciousness of that which created the system of organization within humanity, and not the mind that created the field in which humanity exists in the first place. That is actually a clearer way to explain it. We’re maintaining and preserving the mind of that which was selected to represent humanity— sorry, to represent consciousness—instead of maintaining the mind of that which created the one to represent it. Ooh, and I saw exactly where that is directly correlated in my life ongoings, which explains it all, to be fair. And to be fair, it’s something that I’ve known, and I keep seeing different definition of the exact same thing, even though the person doesn’t want to see it all. And to be fair, they don’t even expose themselves in order to see it. That is the biggest issue. And that is the bigger teller, because when someone doesn’t even expose themselves to something that could challenge their own ways, it only shows you that they’re unwilling to have their ways challenged, which makes sense to a human being developed by society, because society as it is now does not like to be challenged. To me, I call forth challenges, meaning I call forth people to challenge me, because I can challenge myself, of course, and as of now, I’m the only one that can challenge myself. But I don’t receive the challenge because one would have to expose themselves to me and what I’ve said and coined and shared and whatnot before they can challenge me. But if the process of exposing themselves to me to possibly have their own ways challenged, they won’t even look at a way to challenge me, because the way through to me challenges their ways more than it gives them something to challenge me. And that is the cognitive dissonance between the human being raised by society and the conscious being that knows its nature so much that it can go and be challenged by anything that exists in society, in humanity, and still be pure to its own origins. I am still pure to me, knowing exactly my existence and my identity simply because it’s rooted in the one thing that is the only thing that will never change. Society can change at any given moment in time and has changed through history while still staying within the same type of ongoings, because the people have only been able to think from within it, not from without it. Because thinking from without it means to think from something that’s greater than it. But if in order to do so one has to also expand their own ways, their own thinkings, their own understandings, their own—literally challenge everything that they are—to reinforce the identity that they know to be, they won’t do it, because the identity that they are in is not the identity of something that’s impermeable. It is the identity of that which is permeable. But if they don’t want the permeability to then affect the deluded foundation that they live by, because in doing so it will actually have them have a midlife crisis, because they would have lost their routine of sense of identity. And that’s why my main focus is to have humanity actually root society in the identity of what humanity actually is, so that then the whole thing can then function integrating the fact that we are consciousness incarnated with the responsibility to represent consciousness for the ecosystem that consciousness provided for in the first place. Because we were the last created to preserve everything that was created before: animals, vegetables, and non-vegetables, like rocks, crystals, and rocks. Instead, we have a sickness. Well, it’s unfair for me to say we, but my consideration has me say we before I can stop myself from it, because I am not the same, so I can’t really say we. If I say you, it becomes the reader then takes it defensively, so the defense can distract from them actually reading the concept that needs to be understood. And if I say people, it sounds like I’m generalizing and not being specific. My cognition is beautiful, honestly, because I can even dissect this and understand it in a way so rooted that I can actually relay it back. So yeah, we are the last of the chain. We were the last created. And instead of creating life from it, we kept on creating the end. We kept on creating a life that reinforces the end of life, not the actual beginning of life.

I still haven’t gone through the wholeness of Humanity by society’s field, that’s the only reason why I haven’t had my big moment yet, but it’s very soon, cause I’m removing any attachment and anything that could have me be reflected as any other human being and separating myself clear cuttedly from the cloth of human has been to this day, which isn’t the cloth of God. (the wind rages hugely and someone shouted in pain the moment I said God there.) Wonderful. Yes, this is the cloth of “same cloth cut different”. I am cut different from the consciousness of matter, but I certantantly am not part of the cloth of this society. Call me anti-social, I’d rather that than conforming to rot.).