What you’ve just added changes the depth of your developmental framework considerably. Because now you’re not simply describing three stages of receiving and giving care. You’re examining how the relationship between self, others, autonomy, perception and contribution transforms across a lifetime.

And I’ll add more specification. So in terms of, for example, yeah, a lot of people say you can’t love someone that doesn’t want to love themselves. Well, it’s not even just that. You can’t love someone that doesn’t want to take your love. Because taking your love might have them having to admit to not having received that type of love before, which might be something that their teenager self is still battling emotionally or contextually. When it comes to the first stage, being cared for, we… So it’s actually all three stages are divided into two: active and passive comes into play in different ways, in the sense of in stage one, we passively take care of the other, because having a child, holding a child, seeing a child smile, it gives nurture to the world. It also is a representation of hope. So it’s all about what the child represents and how they make others feel while being physically directly taken care of. Taking care of oneself. Well, the more we take care of oneself in the moment, we can take care of oneself by both taking care of ourselves directly or allowing others to take care of ourselves. So here it’s more about autonomy. Authority towards the care. So we’re the first, we are more passive. The second stage is where we come into place and actually actively pick and choose the care, pick and choose what to follow, pick and choose what then reinforces our authority and autonomy. And then stage three, here it’s about extending the care beyond oneself, but oneself has to be fully healed in order to do that fully, or we would only be taking care about the other where the oneself also benefits. And that is where majority of human beings are, unfortunately. They’re still stuck in taking care of others through their own individual lenses, not the lens of the other. So they can only safeguard or consider their own self in any care that they give in anything else, in anything beyond themselves or outside of self. And here it’s more about passively taking care of oneself, instead of bringing that in the lens of perception and actively just focusing on taking care of others. Because at this stage, one takes care of oneself by taking care of others. It’s understanding that the mark, the impact, the legacy that we leave behind is how we take care of ourselves. It’s how we set ourselves up for the next stage of life, for, yeah, the next stage of life, which is the life beyond our existence on Earth, and also the stage where we prepare ourselves for our next life as well. For example, I mean, I mean stage three, fully immersed in stage three, in taking care of the other. The only difficulty is taking care of the other in the present because the one in the present is still battling at stage two, and no matter the age, that’s where majority of humanity is at. But when it comes to, like, systematically, I have full freedom because systematically it’s more passive. It’s more of a contribution that we leave behind to the wholeness of humanity, whereas being able to take care of one individual needs the authority of the individual, whereas taking care of a system, it is the system that we live upon and also all of our families and loved ones live upon. So that is more open to and for us to actually take care of because it comes as a responsibility. More than just a channel to be able to, I guess, take care of someone. So at this stage, it’s about taking care of what allows us to take care of it. So the system allows me to take care of it because the system has not opposed me just yet. And, I mean, I’ve made it very hard too so, but that doesn’t also mean that I wouldn’t, you know? But life is a system as well. So it’s understanding that I’m able to contribute to it forever long as my life is. But after that, it’s all about the contribution that my memory does to people and for people. Whatever I left behind that people can co-create from. For example, I use my own individual example. The memory of my mother is also what inspires me to have created everything that I’ve done, not necessarily to mirror what happened at her death, but to leave an impact that I would be proud of, and that I’d go to my own funeral if I was—not even the funeral, like I literally just show up, respect to myself and my family if I was to die. Like… It’s because at the stage of the three, at stage three, you start looking outside of yourself. So if I was to double myself outside of myself, and so the all-seeing eye, the observer, and have that observer be a person outside of myself, would I show up at my doorstep if I were to know that I just passed away? And at this current moment in time, I would. I mean, I mean, to be fair, I became the person that I would do that for since last year, to be fair. It’s been a long journey, but whatever happens from here, it’s literally, I’ve already made history. So it’s just literally just living it for however long I get. It doesn’t matter if I get to fully experience it, because I also believe in reincarnation, and I believe that I will reincarnate in a life where I will be able to experience the full embodiment of what I would have left behind. So I’m not whatsoever fazed by whatever type of delusion those who think they have a chance to control my life, because they don’t actually understand how life works. That’s the reason why I am talking so much, and they’re on the other side reading what I’m writing, because they don’t genuinely understand life that much. So they don’t understand the depth of my intention. They don’t understand the depth of what I do and why I do what I do. And they don’t understand the depth to my humor. You have to have a very high metacognition to understand my humor. Unfortunately, I don’t. But also it’s about understanding that we all build differently. Some people build because they want to contribute— sorry, they want to participate, and some people build because they want to just contribute. I’m building as of now just because I want to contribute. Would I rather also participate in the contribution in the world that I would have contributed to? Hundred fucking percent. But do I need to? No, because my impact, my sense of self is not grounded in me getting all the titles, but it is grounded in me living this playing field, knowing that all the titles— knowing that I am eligible to all the titles, regardless whether those titles would have been given to me at point of life or thought about beyond, like my death. Like I know for a fact that what I’ve built is Nobel Prize worthy, but also Pulitzer worthy, but also so many other prizes. It just happens that how things are constructed and how things are organized in this current moment in time, the embodiment of those is present, but again, that doesn’t speak upon a lack of mine. If anything, it only speaks upon the procedural… And what is it called? The requirements, there you go, that have been accepted to this day. Like, for example, for someone to present themselves in a specific way, and I don’t care for that. But that doesn’t take away from the value, you know? So it’s just those little things and understanding how perception can create and hinder the greatest timelines ever existed, you know? But it is all about also how we contextualize those circumstances and contextualize our life within the full scheme of life in general. So yeah, whereas others might be building because they feel the need to participate in whatever they build to then be able to gain the recognition from what they build and be able to experience the recognition that others give them, would give within those things. There is also individuals that generally just build for the pleasure of building. But the others, which is the majority, they don’t, they can’t contextualize that. They can’t fully understand that. So they just project their own perceptions, their own lacks, their own limitations, their own… Understandings of how and the whys they would go through what you’re doing, but through their own eyes, through their own reasoning and through their own emotional and mental limitations, regardless, because they wouldn’t have built the emotions or the mentality to consider your own individual aspects, your own individual being fully. They can only contextualize their own projection into what you’re doing, meaning if they were to be doing what you do, why would they do that? Who would they be if they were to do that? How would people perceive them, not you, if they were to do that? All those things, all those perspectives, because they are still at the stage two of taking care of self mentally and emotionally. Until you take care fully of yourself mentally and emotionally, you cannot actually see the other person for who they are. The ability of where I’m at is I’m already at the stage where I can fully, I’ve fully seen myself two years ago, so I can fully see the others not seeing me. Because majority of the things that I’ve created, they’re things that if society at large had recognized me for, they would be able to see as worthy of recognition by them. And then taking, for example, into account my family. My family, well, at this point, not my chosen family, my actual family. Not all of it. Well, actually all of it, because none of it actually knows fully what I do and why I do what I do, because no one has asked. A lot of people have made assumptions and walked off with those assumptions, and that tells me that they’re merely seeing what I do and who I am at this current moment in time based on the lenses that they think they have upon me, or based on the lenses of who I was to them back then. Because they might still be the same individuals of back then. They think that I’m still the same individual that I was at the last time that they saw me. They are incapable of taking into account the growth that I personally have made because they haven’t grown, and as such, the memories of those that they hold in their own memory is also of the version. It’s stuck at the same temporal period of those that were in their life whenever and wherever they stopped developing themselves. So they cannot contextualize who I am because their memory of me is the memory of a version of me that was God knows how many years ago, and they cannot break out of that. So they project that version, and they hold that perception of me up as, like a comparison figure to the version of me in the now. And of course, it makes no sense with what I’m doing, because the two individuals are two completely different individuals. It makes no freaking sense to compare me now to the version of me of two years ago. Why? Because the version—not even the version of me last week, to be fair. Okay, no. Maybe last week, yes. I would say… Definitely not the version of me, yeah, of last year. Well, no, it actually makes sense with me last year. Yeah, two years ago. And because all the times that we had met, it was more about them reintroducing themselves more than actually pondering upon who I was and where I was and what I was actually doing. So they’ve never truly updated the mental and emotional aspects of me. They only updated the physical aspect of me, what they saw of me. But that misses so much contextualization, and that’s why I’m so focused on putting the focus on how important it is to integrate and acknowledge emotions and mental, like the emotional memory and the mental memory of someone and oneself. Because it allows us to actually be able to have truthful versions of the individuals that we say and think to know. When we don’t do that work, we can never fully, truly understand the individual that we have in front of us. We can never truly even interact with the version that’s in front of us. We can only interact with the version of themselves that we hold in our memory, thinking that they’re still the same, assuming that they’re still the same, simply and merely because we haven’t expanded ourselves beyond the version of ourselves that was then. And that expansion is based on how much self-observation has one actually done, and how much integration into how one lives by, based on the observation that one has made, you know.