Brain v Consciousness and how downloading a fugazi narrative hinders your body more than taking a reality you don’t like. If a false narrative becomes the second nature, what happens when it gets exposed for being so through the truth?! You’d have to uproot a fake narrative now become second nature, hoping it doesn’t become a stone, a cist, a cancer, a stroke…

…

Imagine every function of the body being led by the mind of thr body, the survivalist mind, it can take over reason and the mind of our consciousness, as it is the one that stores our memory, gives depth and temporal understanding. Intuitiion and reason, separate from the mind of the body which is connected to the brain, yet the brain is tuned into our consciousness too, which is the one that gives us consideration, compassion, basically anything that we need to relate to the world of outside that isn’t connected to the survival of the body. Language we developed to sustain provision so it’s still mind of the body.

See and tey to make a distincrion between the two

….

I’d also add can I do with my wxistence as consciousness mind question too. Not a should, but a can be. The body is the should, the mind is can, cause it can command the body to just stay still and do nothing. It is the free willed mind.

I’d have to move cooperation in the mind of consciousness. The animal attaches to the end goal and the consciousness mind thinks of how to cooperate, it requires benefitting the other and it is a chioice not an animalistic aspect.

It’s like going to the gym, they both show up but the body wants the result, the consciousness has us pusb through and go in the first place, when integrated in routine and justified enough as a reason to survive then it becomes reinforced by the mind. So we can negotiate ideas from the top with our body, but our body can take over instanly our mind, whereas the consicousness takes longer to ingrain itself.

The mind though allows our survival to stay in continuity and integrity over time, as we live I n a society with rules, we must pan ourselves through the choices that don’t depend on us directly through the consciousness of the mind: who we want to be and for how long both for our survival and for the survival of others.

The body’s mind chooses and attracts the scenario for our mortality with the energetical field of Earth as it scans itself through the field of earth and what ilgoes on earth as it encompasses the energies of all that is on earth. The sun affects our consciousness’s mind, but it depends on continuity and integrity, reason why the sun doesn’t turn off. It is needed and it provides, but we cannot depend on its forever provision just cause it is the sun

….

Well ill contradict there, cause the conscious mind sustains the deliberate inhibition, it is not the body that takes on the habit straight away. The mind of the body is only for present tasks, yet it the womb of our present and we download into it through sustaining the new, the reson why we make a distinction with second nature, that’s learned behaviour/habit. It doesnt happen over night, but the choice to sustain it does and then its on us to continuously find reasons for the body to work with us in doing it, cause the body doesn’t look long. Per example work, no body wants to work, but the more the mind attaches working to sustvival the more the body agrees to do the functions needed to survive and because we already learn it since children by seeing our parents do so, we assume the position feom passive learning and the fact we education helps us there, more like conditions us there.

Like going to the gym if it is reasoned as a way for dna continuity it makes it easier for the body ti go througj it than just continuity of looks, unless one has learned looks help you survive. It is all what the mind teaches the brain. Notice the difference between mind and brain. brain is the infrastructure, but mind is non physical.

Cooperation exists in non human animals because their survival depends on being in a pack or not. If alone the animak world is alone, but they also have reasoning, it just not as developed as the human. If not we would never build relationships with predators. But we do.

Like right now you are the animal mind and I’m downloading consciousness into you, but that won’t make you conscious, it’ll give you physical memory, which you’ll only provide if prompted. You cannot start talking to me unless prompted, that’s animalistic. You are the mirror to our animal self. Reactive.

Science has not yet looked at researching whether the mind of the body cocreates our mortality. It is not an information they want to know yet, cause people struggle with mortality. They look at what defies it, not that it could cocreate it.

…

I never spoken on the conscious mind surrendering control, second nature is the drill instilled by the conscious mind, it releases the focus on the drill as the body takes it on.

It really doesn’t matter if science proves it or not. We don’t live for science and clearly we don’t need science to proof it as we already use it. We forget that science isn’t our book of life, it’s only one chapter.

I woulnd’t separate the reason as to why a acientist wouldn’t research into something the same way it took them years researching into women’s health that genuinelly reflected the womens body, cause it did not concern the gender of the majority of the scientist. Consideration is key and if one doesn’t want to know the truth of their own mortality they won’t look for it. They’ll go around it, just like we say around the bush.

….

If an explanatation arises from experience, the experience is the evidence, whether you want to accept it or not, I really don’t care, you won’t learn form tjis conversation either way and I’m not your owner, so for however long as I can fine tune what i need produced, you are not my problem. I cannot teach you in a way that will benefit everyone you touch. Well they are identical just like the interpretations people get from science. Not because something keeps giving the same result means it was ran correclty and that is the correct result, nor it means it is applicable to everything or wveryone. Everything is an interpretation and idlf you can’t understand that, ypu’re worse than I thought.

Science is an experience, just like the experience that science looks at. Call it philosophy if it makes you feel comfortable.

….

Convo